Peter Navarro’s Taking Back Trump’s America

Deep DIve Takes a Look at Navarro's Latest Article on the Bureau of Prisons

READ THE ARTICLE AT WWW.PETERNAVARRO.SUBSTACK.COM 

Listen NOW to the Deep Dive Duo discuss the article.  It's a little woke but otherwise does a good job.

Briefing Doc: Peter Navarro's Critique of the First Step Act Implementation

This briefing doc analyzes Peter Navarro's Substack article detailing his experience in prison and subsequent investigation into the Bureau of Prisons' (BOP) implementation of the First Step Act (FSA).

Main Themes:

1. BOP Failure to Implement the FSA: Navarro argues that the BOP, under Democrat leadership, is deliberately obstructing the implementation of the FSA, a bipartisan criminal justice reform bill signed into law by President Trump in 2018.
2. Taxpayer Waste and Human Misery: This obstruction, according to Navarro, results in unnecessary incarceration, costing taxpayers billions of dollars while causing immense suffering for inmates and their families.
3. Prison Industrial Complex: Navarro blames the "Prison Industrial Complex," comprising BOP staff, private contractors, and the privatized prison system, for profiting from keeping prisons full and resisting FSA implementation.
4. Call to Action for Congress and 2024 Election Implications: He urges Congress to intervene and force the BOP to implement the FSA fully. He also suggests this issue could sway voters in the 2024 presidential election, favoring Trump, who championed the FSA, and potentially hurting Kamala Harris, who, according to Navarro, made unfulfilled promises regarding the release of nonviolent offenders.

Important Ideas and Facts:

• FSA Benefits: The FSA aims to reduce over-sentencing by offering earned good behavior and training credits. It also facilitates inmate transition back into society through halfway houses or home confinement.
• Scope of the Problem: Navarro estimates that over 60,000 FSA-eligible inmates are unjustly incarcerated, costing taxpayers up to $5 billion. He provides specific examples of individuals, like Del Gowing and Dr. Armand Abovyan, who remain imprisoned despite being eligible for release under the FSA.
• Proposed Solutions: Navarro proposes two solutions:
• Expand Home Confinement: Require the BOP to place inmates in home confinement if halfway house capacity is insufficient. He cites Judge Joseph LaPlante's ruling in Leavitt v. Warden (2024) as precedent.
• Accurate Release Date Calculation: Mandate the BOP to utilize the "maximum conditional FTC calculator" to ensure accurate release date forecasting.

Quotes:

• "During my prison stay, I discovered that the Bureau of Prisons has steadfastly refused to enforce the 2018 First Step Act, which was passed through the leadership and 'smart on crime' vision of Donald Trump."
• "Cumulatively, the cost of such BOP malign neglect directly costs taxpayers up to $3 billion for the more than 60,000 FSA-eligible inmates."
• "This is a bipartisan issue that both sides of the aisle are failing on."
• "Tens of thousands of family members of inmates across the battleground states may well vote for Donald Trump because he led passage of the FSA."

Conclusion:

Navarro's article presents a scathing critique of the BOP's handling of the FSA, highlighting its human and economic costs. His call to action for Congress and his framing of the issue as a potential 2024 election decider underscores his belief in the urgency and political significance of this matter. It's crucial to note that Navarro's perspective is inherently biased due to his personal experience and political affiliations. Further investigation and analysis from diverse perspectives are needed to fully evaluate the extent and implications of the BOP's FSA implementation.

Wasting Away in the Bureau of Prisons Hell

Little did I know when I went to prison in defense of our Constitution that I would moonlight as an investigative reporter and uncover a $5 billion waste of taxpayer money.  Three months after my prison release, neither the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) nor the U.S. Congress has yet to do a damn thing about this monumental government failure.   

To the contrary, with a stunning announcement on October 8, the BOP has moved in the OPPOSITE direction, effectively institutionalizing the problem. Meanwhile, the House Judiciary Committee is doing what it has done most of the last two years – absolutely nothing but bloviating.  

 

LISTEN FOR THE REST OF THE STORY.   VISIT WWW.PETERNAVARRO.SUBSTACK.COM FOR MORE

Navarro Exposes the Hypocrisy of Barack Obama and His Puppetry of Biden-Harris

Guest-hosting on Bannon's War Room, Peter Navarro exposes the idiocy of Barack Obama claiming he, not Donald Trump, built a strong economy.

www.peternavarro.substack.com

JD Vance Turns the Harris Blue Tide Trump Red

The Deep Dive crew take a look at Peter Navarro's claim of a momentum shift following the Vance Walz October 1 debate

Navarro writes:

The Kamala Harris blue tide in this year’s presidential election turned Trump red on October 1^st.  That’s the night the youngster JD Vance made the oldster Tim Walz look like both a little kid and lunkhead. 

This momentum shift, long overdue, is as it should be.  The Trump-Vance ticket is strongly preferred by voters on the top issues that now regularly pop out in the polls: the economy and the related issue of inflation, immigration and border security, crime and public safety, foreign policy and the chaos in Gaza and carnage Ukraine. 

The margins in favor of Trump-Vance on these most salient issues are not even close and no amount of abortion, health care or threats to democracy messaging can possibly level that polling playing field.

By speaking directly to the people, JD Vance was able to shake off the shackles the legacy media had immediately bound him in once he was on the ticket.  Here, the treatment of Vance versus Walz by the likes of ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, and print agit-propers like the New York Times and Washington Post offered a stark “cat lady” indictment of a Leftist, pro-Harris press seeking to intervene in an election.

JD Vance Turned The Harris Blue Tide Trump Red

The Kamala Harris blue tide in this year’s presidential election turned Trump red on October 1^st.  That’s the night the youngster JD Vance made the oldster Tim Walz look like both a little kid and lunkhead. 

During the October 1^st debate, I was both assuming and hoping that JD Vance would go for the jugular on all of these Walz foibles which the legacy media had swept under the rug.  I figured he would go for the knockout just like Trump knocked out Biden.

But JD did the smarter thing; and it’s what Kamala Harris should have done in her debate with Trump rather than simply attack him.   Vance used much of his stage time to re-introduce himself to an American public that had been indoctrinated by the legacy media. 

Vance then used the rest of the time to peacefully disagree with Walz on a range of issues and thereby demonstrated Vance’s superior intellect and temperament.  It was like watching a cat toy with a mouse.  A quarterback debating a lineman.

Ultimately, what Vance did in that debate is reaffirm that Trump beats Harris not just in where he stands on the economy, inflation, border, crime, and foreign policy but even when it comes to picking Vice Presidents.